User Rating: 0 / 5

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

Prof. Bhim Singh who was a Legislator three times in the Legislature of J&K, a Sr. Advocate, Executive Chairman of State Legal Aid Committee, J&K who has been fighting for Human Rights of all human beings on earth has respectfully raised the following questions on the characteristic of Article 35-A in the Constitution which he hopes may be answered by every supporter and opponent to the formulation of Article 35-A which was inserted in the Indian Constitution by the President of India in 1954 without referring it to the Parliament or without testing its legality before any Constitution Bench/Court.

Q.1.     Who has introduced/formulated the Constitution of India which was promulgated on January 26, 1950? Who had approved that Constitution of India?

Ans.    It is very simple for all of us to answer that the Constitution of India was formulated by the Constituent Assembly of India after a long discussion/debate for nearly three years after India was declared independent in 1947. It was finally promulgated on January 26, 1950.

Q.2.     When Article 35-A was promulgated and by whom? Who was authorized to amend any part of the Constitution according to the Constitution itself? Who was competent to amend any Article/Provision contained in any Article ranging from Article 12 to 35 as this chapter dealt with Fundamental Rights in the Constitution which were guaranteed to all citizens of India?

Ans.    No legislature or even authority enjoyed any right/privilege to amend any provision guaranteed in any Article relating to the Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution. The Parliament was later declared competent within the meaning and scope of Article 368 of the Indian Constitution was competent to amend any provision in the Fundamental Rights in accordance with the procedure and conditions provided in the Constitution. No state had any competence to even touch any provision in Chapter-III on the Fundamental Rights. The procedure as laid down in the Constitution has to be followed by the Parliament.

Q.3.     How and by whom Article 35 was amended by adding ‘A’ and introduce Article 35-A in the Constitution and when? Under what authority it was introduced?

Ans.    That is very important question which needs to be understood by all those who are opposing this amendment and those who are supporting Article 35-A. Article 35-A was promulgated under the Presidential Order naturally signed and issued by the then President of India, Dr. Rajendra Prasad in May 1954. The President of India had constitutional power as the President of India to introduce any amendment on the recommendation of the Prime Minister and his Council of Ministers. It was recommended by the then Prime Minister Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru and promulgated by a Presidential Order on May 14, 1954. The Presidential Order, according to the command of the Constitution of India could not have survived beyond six months. Therefore such ordinance was valid till December 1954 only. This Presidential Order had no legal sanction beyond December 1954.

Q.4.     What were the constitutional effects of this amendment in Article 35?

Ans.    This amendment could have been utilized/used by the Govt. of J&K to frame laws/rules in connection with the application of Fundamental Rights to the citizens of India in J&K for a period of six months only. It would have become a law only had Parliament of India taken up the matter and passed this amendment in order to bring a change in Article 35 in accordance with the procedure laid down. This Presidential Order could have effected the application of Fundamental Rights to the Permanent Residents of J&K only for a period of six months. Any law could have been framed by the State of J&K to impose any restriction on the special rights or privileges of the citizens of India residing as Permanent Residents in J&K. The Govt. of J&K should have used its dictatorial powers to impose restrictions upon the Permanent Residents of J&K with respect to any or the following manner for a period of six months, that too in respect of;

            i).        Employments under the State Government.

            ii).       Acquisition of immovable property in the State.

iii).      Settlement in the State by outsiders. It had no constitutional/legal dependence with the provisions contained in Article 370 of the Indian Constitution.

This is important to understand that this amendment called 35-A had also limited scope and empowered the State Govt. to control local employment or restrict acquisition of immovable property or check settlement in the state of the outsiders.

Q.5.     How this amendment namely 35-A is applicable today in 2018 and what are its effects on the Permanent Residents of J&K?

Ans.    According to the Constitution of India this amendment lapsed in December 1954 itself. Even otherwise it had effected/harmed the Fundamental Rights of the Permanent Residents of J&K who were called ‘State Subjects’ since 1927. This amendment had no effect on the status of the Permanent Residents of J&K who were guaranteed State Subject with constitutional rights by Maharaja Hari Singh in 1927 by virtue of all called ‘State Subject’. The Constitution of India had made it clear that no Public Interest Laws which stand implemented in J&K for the welfare of the Permanent Residents shall be a subject of the Parliament. And all such rights as were guaranteed to the J&K State Subjects in Chapter-III of the Indian Constitution shall remain intact. They were declared in its Royal Decree by Maharaja Hari Singh in 1927. No provision of the rights of the Permanent Residents shall be effected by any provision in the Constitution of India. In brief the Article 35-A had no such provision which could have disturbed the rights and the privileges guaranteed to the Permanent Residents of the State of J&K guaranteed by the State Subject in 1927. The amendment 35-A dealt with employment, acquisition by the Union of India of immovable property or settlement of the outsiders only. This has nothing in it which could disturb/obstruct any of the Fundamental Rights of the Permanent Residents of J&K who were recognized as citizens of India on January 26, 1950 in accordance with the provisions in the Constitution of India. This Chapter of Fundamental Rights was disturbed by the Presidential Order amending Article 35 and introducing Article 35-A in the Indian Constitution. The Constitution of J&K is in no way under the command/ dictates of Article 35-A and vice-versa. The Constitution of India could not be controlled by a State Constitution.  

Q.6.     Why political parties which govern J&K since 1950 are opposing Article 35-A?

Ans.    It is very interesting question which needs to be studied to understand the psychological background of those who have been in power for nearly 70 years and have started beating the drums in public in support of unconstitutional provision which lapsed in December, 1954-- 35-A. The parties which ruled J&K for several years with crude illegal rules and using detention laws against the youth in particular to continue their suppressive and oppressive rule for decades. The political parties which have been ruling J&K without rule of law using all kinds of oppressive and suppressive measures for decades have suddenly cropped up propaganda in favour of Article 35-A. They are also supporting this amended Article before the Supreme Court of India. The reason is very simple and can be understood by the people of J&K in particular if they re-look at the pages of the J&K history which has been full of violence, illegal detentions, unlawful arrests of the youth in particular who have been demanding fundamental rights and justice. Even myself, the composer, of this question had suffered at the hands of rulers of National Conference, PDP, the Congress and even BJP now for several years of detentions under illegal arrests and detentions in J&K jails. There are several orders of the Supreme Court of India relating to the release of this prisoner by the orders of the Supreme Court. Even Supreme Court awarded compensation to this writer when he was illegally detained when he was sitting MLA of the Panthers Party. These political leaders, the so-called champions of freedom demanding removal of Article 35-A have been misruling and using detentions and jails against their opponents fighting for justice and equity. They have suddenly become spokesmen for the suppressed and oppressed citizens of India in J&K called ‘Permanent Residents’. This is pety that those who have bungled with the Fundamental Rights of the Permanent Residents of J&K, detained hundreds and thousands of innocent residents of J&K in the name of security and public order have suddenly come out as spokesman of the fundamental rights of the permanent residents of J&K.

Q.7.     How political parties in J&K supporting Article 35-A are unjustified?

Ans.    The political parties who ruled J&K for decades with iron hand seeking constitutional support from the provisions contained in Article 370 for nearly 65 years have suddenly started supporting those political elements in J&K whom they used to accuse as anti-India elements and enemies of peace. They have joined hands today with other Kashmiri Hurriyat Conference leaders who do not accept the Constitution of India. Let them decide do they accept the Constitution of India or not. How can ex-ruling parties in J&K justify their support to the slogan of Hurriyat Conference? Do these political leaders--ex-rulers, agree with the manifesto and slogan of the Hurriyat Conference? Can Hurriyat Conference leaders justify their stand on 35-A which itself has empowered the Govt. of J&K to slash all fundamental rights which were guaranteed in Chapter-III of the Constitution of India in 1950 to the Permanent Residents of J&K/State Subjects? Shall these political parties answer to the Permanent Residents of the State if they would allow all fundamental rights to flow into J&K as have been enjoyed by all citizens of India. 

Q.8.     Why Hurriyat Conference and other slogan mongers are supporting such political parties in J&K which are opposing 35-A?

Ans.    It deserves to be understood in prospective keeping in view the present political situation in J&K. Most of the disgruntled political elements in J&K are convinced that people of J&K shall live in peace sharing all fundamental rights with the citizens of India. They have been taking every opportunity to help/promote confusion and disturbance. The ex-ruling party leaders have started beating the drums to create confusion and promote lawlessness in J&K which will help only those who have been supporting anarchy and lawlessness in the state.

Q.9.     What needs to be done to convince the permanent residents in the state in this crisis?

Ans.    This is very simple. Declare fundamental rights to all the permanent residents of the state repeating, as is proclaimed in the Indian Constitution that the fundamental rights to the permanent residents of J&K shall remain intact and the rights of the permanent residents which were guaranteed by Maharaja Hari Singh in 1927 shall not be disturbed as has been assured in the Constitution of India. Article 35-A stands lapsed since December 1954 itself. The matter is before the Supreme Court of India. No law, even the Parliament cannot rescue Article 35-A even if they desires so because there is a Parliament in India which has sovereign authority vested in it by the Constitution. J&K is integral part of India as was declared by the Constitution of India at that time when Constitution of India was promulgated on January 26, 1950. The State of J&K is integral part of the Union of India with exclusive fundamental rights guaranteed to all its citizens, the Permanent Residents.  

User Rating: 0 / 5

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

SRINAGAR: Education refers to the all-round development of the personality of an individual and aims at the complete transformation of his/her life. It is not merely the acquisition of degrees or certificates from institutions of excellence, but, rather a tool which facilitates the paradigm shift in the life of a learner in terms of character development, morality, good behaviour, responsible role towards the society, creation of skills, inculcation of values and good belief systems in the society, etc. It is an old aged saying that one is known by the company he keeps. A learner who spends time in the life in the company of learned is far apart from others who are aloof of learning.

Education facilitates a learning state in a student from the day one makes inroads within an institution. History is witness to the fact that in earlier times, the centres of learning where Madrassas and patshalas in India, including Kashmir. Thence after, with the advent of an institutional mechanism, the learning equations underwent a major shift and institutions became the centres of knowledge, with further impetus post-arrival of science and technology and paraphernalia of the modern times. Education is today at the fingertips of the people, but, it is the teacher and the institution that play a vital role in the real dissemination of the knowledge and pull a learner towards the state of enlightenment from the confines of the darkness. Even, the globalization of knowledge has made the facilitation of knowledge easy and at convenience.

Education in the past times was although an enterprise of a few and affluent, but, today, in contrast, every Tom, Dick and Harry has a bunch of degrees to his credit, although variable across the spectrum of specialization. However, the educational system of Kashmir is beset with a majority of problems. The major harm that has been done to the educational sector is due to the unhealthy state of political atmosphere and waywardness in our state of J&K. Every other day, due to uncertain nature of the situations in Kashmir, the educational institutions are closed day-in and day-out. The major portion of the year is lost in the whirlpool of political uncertainty. The recurring uncertain phases of the events has badly affected our educational sector and inflicted a heavy damage thereof. Today, the children are not ready to come to school. Others, who attend the days in the educational institutions, are short of patience. This is a major concern for the current times. Education is an asset of the nation.

Due to the prevailing uncertain situation in our state, the students have turned awry. Gone are the days when students used to respect teachers in a comprehensive way. Today, a single taunt of discipline from a teacher is a heart-wrenching affair. Teachers who suggest the pupils to mend their ways invite ire of their parents. The government has made teachers like handicapped as they can’t do anything in the current political crisis. Recently, when in a government institute, the teachers after much parleys denied student’s entry into school on account of proper school shoes, next day, a respectable citizen came fuming and said that don’t mend them, tomorrow, may they harm you, it will trouble you. What can a teacher do at that point in time? A teacher is today a thorn in the eye of the people. He is being victimized by taunts like he is any hardcore criminal and takes the salary from the people’s pockets. The major problem is that there should have been some moderate sort of corporal punishment for the students because, in our times, the stick was called as mind-striver (akalnuma) as we bore it and also safeguards for the teachers.

It was a long time ago that Zakat Foundation of India chairman, Syed Zaffar Mehmood said that Kashmiri students are highly talented. But, that talent should be nourished and properly channelized under the auspicious aegis of teachers. Besides, the teachers should also focus on the creative aspect of the education. It is not merely the passage of knowledge in the classrooms, rather, there should be an inbuilt medium created by a teacher in the classroom to vent the creative talent of the students. The second most problem in our classrooms is that there are no or less demonstrative activities in the classroom. A classroom should become like a laboratory in itself, where students can themselves perform the activities themselves regarding their lessons, under the guidance of their subject specialist teachers.

Another important problem is that parents force themselves on their wards, so far as career choices are concerned, without looking for the inbuilt literary taste of their wards. Long time back, there was medical and engineering craze in Kashmir. Since Dr. Shah Faesal topped the IAS in 2010; the wavy nature of the students is caught in the quagmire of civil services as of now. It should not be like this. There is something beyond the confines of short-term visions of goal. There are a plethora of career choices beyond the intermediate level. The proper counseling of the students is the need of the hour. There should be the pause of parent’s intervention in the student’s career choice and an end to the switch-off and switch on mechanisms.

Cutting long story short, education as of now in Kashmir is caught in a distraught situation. Well-offs have sent their wards to learning abodes of knowledge centres and institutions. It is the poor who suffers as of now. Children should maximise their learning within the minimum of time they get in the academic session of the year. Parents should create an ethical environment in their homes for their wards. Teachers should change their strategy of learning and move beyond the pages of books towards a greater clarity and focus on skill development, demonstrative abilities and research inculcation in the students.

This way of a healthy triangular relationship between student, teacher and parents can become a boost in the arm for the rectifying the faulty system of education in our Kashmir. Every teacher is a good scholar, but that scholastic aptitude must droop down towards the students as the world of today’s cut-throat competition demands so. Together, the wheel of education can be pushed towards the greater good of the society. Parents should keep a tight vigil on their students and inculcate a spirit of morality in them. This way they can perform as the better students of today and best citizens of tomorrow who respect their teacher’s and elders totally.

The government has made enormous provisions in the educational institutions in terms of highly qualified teacher’s, infrastructure, scholarships, etc for the students in general and poor in particular. Only that is required is the zeal and zest of the students to learn, achieve their goals and make the name of the state and country, time and again, high in achievements. 

User Rating: 0 / 5

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

ANANTNAG: The appeals from the families to their militant sons asking them to return home have shown an upward trend in Kashmir. The families in their requests tend to justify why the living of their child with them is more important than being a militant. 

 

Sometimes it is ailing and elderly parents citing their health conditions as a reason to see their son home again, sometimes it is a mother who appears in the press enclave and addresses a press conference, asking her son to come back. On other occasions, it is a sister who pens down an emotional letter to her militant brother, talking about the consequences of his decision to join militancy on their family. 

 

The letter was written by Rifat Sidiq, a Psychologist and Burhan Ganai’s sister who joined Hizbul Mujahideen June this year. Gania, a resident of S.K. colony Islamabad (Aanantnag) has a Bachelor’s Degree in Physiotherapy. Kashmir News Bureau (KNB) reproduces the letter in full below: 

 

“Burhan Soab, It all started since you have left, a shining star that was known for your wisdom, compassion and unbelievable patience. We are stunned, shattered with your decision that left us all in pieces. Yet! Our courageous parents will stand on their toes and ask for forgiveness to Allah (SWT). 

 

In the meantime, they keep gazing at the front gate that our son will show up any time, murmuring to each other do you know anything of him, did you find any clue, where he could be possibly, is he eating anything, is he even taking his medicines and what not we have to see them go through in your absence. We wish you were here to see yourself the grave and grim life of your ailing mother and father. 

 

Sometimes a person feels the path he has chosen is the ultimate path of success, but think about it who would want his parents to suffer mercilessly, have they not raised us to be their old age strength, have they not had aspirations and dreams. We all get carried with our emotions and in that there is always someone who would come to hijack whatever little we are left with. Our father had a dream of seeing his elder son become a Doctor and yet he feels dejected and deceived, how come we are on a right path if we end up killing our parents slowly and mercilessly.

Let’s show some empathy with our parents and be there reason of calmness not the reason of catastrophes, have they not seen enough in their lives, have they not suffered earlier tell us why we would we make them suffer more, you are our hope to end all our sufferings and yet you left us in darkness. I know you understand the consequences of your decision and its implications on our parents who are already battling their life. 

 

And while I am writing, I keep cleaning your books, look up to your room, upto its four walls where I see the reflections of your face, your voice echoes in my ears as if you’re Calling me out loud “Riffat Di” and yet I cannot hear. This is the worst feeling being in your room without you around and holding your trophies and medals. If this was supposed to be our destiny then I better would end up my life before you could even think of leaving us in the middle of nowhere. 

 

To conclude, I request all of you to ask our ailing brother return home for his own health. for his parents who are battling with life threatening diseases. I know as a society we can be the drivers of change. Let us prove it this time.

Long live Kashmir- Long live Humanity. 

 

P.S. I love my Brother”