Share your story and shine at JK Monitor!🌟 Welcome to JK Monitor, where every story matters and every achievement is celebrated! We invite you to share the remarkable journey of your life and showcase your accomplishments to the world. Join our exclusive interviews that honor exceptional individuals just like you. JAMMU: In the alleged over Rs 500-crore “fake silver” offerings controversy concerning Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Ji Shrine at Katra, the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jammu, presided over by Munish Kumar Manhas, today directed the Inquiry Officer of the Crime Branch to appear personally before the Court along with the relevant record of the matter on the next date of hearing, fixed for 29 July 2026.
The direction was passed in proceedings arising from an application filed by Advocate Deepak Sharma, who had earlier submitted a detailed complaint before the Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch, Jammu, and the Senior Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch, Economic Offences Wing, Jammu, seeking registration of an FIR and a comprehensive investigation into the alleged adulteration, substitution and possible misappropriation of silver offerings made by devotees at Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Ji Shrine.
The complaint, submitted on 9 May 2026 alleged the commission of serious cognizable offences, including criminal conspiracy, cheating, criminal breach of trust, misappropriation, manipulation of records and the possible procurement or use of cadmium-laden material.
As no effective action was disclosed by the Crime Branch, the complainant approached the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jammu, seeking an action-taken report and an appropriate direction for registration of an FIR and investigation of the case.
Pursuant to the Court’s direction, the Crime Branch filed a status report stating that the complaint had initially been forwarded to Crime Headquarters, Srinagar, for approval and, after receipt of such approval, was thereafter forwarded to the Zonal Police Headquarters, Jammu, for “appropriate action.”
Advocate Deepak Sharma today filed detailed objections to the status report and argued that mere administrative forwarding of the complaint could not amount to lawful action upon information disclosing cognizable offences. He submitted that the Crime Branch, Economic Offences Wing, Jammu, is itself a notified Police Station under the relevant Home Department notification, with its Superintendent of Police functioning as the Station House Officer.
It was argued that the Crime Branch was statutorily required to deal with the complaint in accordance with the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and could not avoid its legal responsibility merely by forwarding the complaint to another police authority.
The objections also pointed out that the status report did not disclose any steps having been taken for the preservation of crucial evidence, including inventory registers, stock records, CCTV footage, dispatch and transportation documents, assay reports, Mint correspondence, electronic records and records relating to the receipt, storage, transportation, testing and melting of the offerings.
After hearing the arguments, the learned Court directed the Crime Branch Inquiry Officer connected with the matter to remain personally present before the Court along with the relevant record on 29 July 2026.
Background of the Complaint
The controversy arose from reports that approximately 20 tonnes of accumulated silver offerings, stated to be worth around Rs. 550 crore, had reportedly been sent for testing, melting and processing. However, only approximately five to six per cent of the material was reportedly found to be actual silver, while the remaining material allegedly found to be ‘fake’ and consisted of cadmium, iron and other inferior metals.
The complaint seeks an investigation into whether devotees had been sold fake or adulterated silver articles by vendors and jewellers, or whether genuine silver offerings had been substituted, diluted, pilfered or misappropriated at any stage after their receipt, including during inventory, weighing, storage, transportation, assaying or melting.
The complaint also seeks investigation into the source, manufacture, procurement and supply chain of the alleged cadmium-laden material, as well as fixation of responsibility upon all persons, officials, custodians, vendors, suppliers, handlers or transporters found involved.