What is required to write anything? A subject, experiential thinking on that particular subject, study, linguistic knowledge… and? Even more important is the desire to write. It is true that a specific situation is required for writing. Sometimes our pain or some sad or happy experience automatically forces us to write, but even for writing like this, the support of some incident is necessary. If there is no subject, then what will be written and why?
Now comes the turn of subjects. Man is only a part of the universe. With our knowledge, understanding and worldly experiences, we assume that this world is only as much as we have seen, heard and known, but many mysteries about the infinite universe are still untouched by our senses, hence invisible. So subjects are spread all around us. Those subjects also belong to both the categories of perceptible and invisible.
On one hand, for invisible subjects, difficult spiritual practices are required, on the other hand, perceptible subjects are easily available, the requirement is only how we feel that subject and what is our viewpoint about it? Now when it comes to viewpoint, how is our viewpoint determined as to which subject we should choose and what to write on it? This question is the most complicated question of today's writers.
However, nowadays a hostile environment has been created in ideological subjects. Writers have started keeping distance from such subjects on which someone can object. He does not believe in thinking about the loyalty and interests of the objector and the objectioner. One reason for this is that in our country, such 'social engineering' of the intellects has been done, which has caused a kind of ideological paralysis in the self-confidence and loyalty of the writers.
You have been made to memorize some subjects by calling them absolutely avoidable to such an extent that you have become indifferent and unwilling towards those subjects. Your loyalty has been forcibly created in such so-called avoidable subjects. Revolutions with swords are recorded at many places in history, but today is the time of ideological revolution and the most important thing at this time is the pen.
Today, the pen has once again become relevant and important as an effective weapon of revolution. It is becoming prestigious. This is the era of ideological violence, so today the writer needs to be especially alert and aware. In today's digital age, your access to information has become very easy. In a moment, you can access any information with just one click, but information is a very dangerous thing. Information is very explosive in itself without understanding its origin, its inner truth, its various angles, its implications and objectives. This is the reason why today society is not able to agree on any subject. The biggest reason behind it is the lack of 'authentic' study. Why authentic has been written here has already been discussed in the previous lines.
Today writers believe in writing only on those subjects in which they have ideological or political allegiance. Attempts to put the entire society in the dock on some evils or incidents prevalent in the society have started creating an environment of negative discussion. Before expressing sympathy towards the victim or talking about his rights, writers have started looking at his religion, sect and caste, instead of raising their voice in favor of the justice of the gruesomeness of that incident. In this matter, today's writers are suffering from prejudices.
Today it is becoming fashionable to make fun of one's religion, nation and religious leaders and such people are being given the title of intellectuals. Writing is considered meaningful only when it describes religion as hypocrisy, this liberal religious group as violent. Why writers are not able to understand this simple thing is beyond comprehension. If seen on an ideological level, today the world has been divided into two camps.
The first camp is the Left and the second is the Right, i.e. Leftism and Rightism. While the right wing is often struggling to establish its national concerns, the left wing is more successful in spreading its attractive but inhuman-anti-national ideologies because they 'seem' to be the advocates of the ultimate limit of 'anarchy'. It is surprising that the right wing, which is called the 'right wing', is always called wrong despite being 'right'! Those who are interested in writing on social issues, they also write only on those subjects in which they have political, caste or economic commitment. People divided into various factions are gradually taking the form of factions themselves.
